How Long is this track? started by ford_runner1
	September 13th 2006 at 3:42 AM Post #1
	ford_runner1 Starting Member 8 Posts Group: Members Member Since: September 7th 2006 Location: Elbow Lake, MN, USA
	I recently bought a 95 XLT RMK Model#0950956 serial#2410235. when I got it it was basically just a rolling frame if you can call it that. Complete minus motor, hood and seat. The track is fairly new polaris part#540892. Could somone please tell me how long it is. Also I would like whatever info i can get on this sled. What kind of suspension does it have, the type of skis it came with etc. And why does it seem like this sled isnt supposed to exsist. Whatever anyone can give me. Whether its a website or 400 pages of tech info would be greatly appreciated. Thank You Shawn ford_runner1@yahoo.com Rating: 0 Quick Edit Edit Topic

	Site Supporter Group: Site Supporters

	September 13th 2006 at 7:29 AM Post #2
	sledhead_2002 Advanced Member 1053 Posts Group: Members Member Since: June 28th 2004 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Current Sled: 02 900 RMK
	a 95 should be a 133" 02 900 RMK 159" 200 hp 98 XC 700 for the little man Proud member of team SUMMER SUCKS WINNIPEG MB CANADA Full time sledaholic Spending the cash on MOD'S for 09 Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 13th 2006 at 9:23 AM Post #3
	bundox4life Advanced Member 1896 Posts Group: Members Member Since: February 27th 2006 Location: Deep River, Ontario, Canada
	i think its 133.5 not 100% sure tho build it, bust it and repeat 03prox440 Tag T2's homemade riser blackrace windield c&a pro skis homemade can Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 13th 2006 at 10:26 AM Post #4
	95XCR600 is hiding in your girlfriend's closet! 3409 Posts Group: Members Member Since: December 23rd 2002 Location: Mason City, IA, USA Current Sled: '03 Polaris XC 600 SP 2008-2009 Miles: 0
	I thought they were an SKS (Snow King Special) in '95, not the RMK (Rocky Mountain King)? Either way, I believe that the 133.5 inch track (as already stated) is correct. Check your build date, if it's late in the year of '95, than it's more than likely the '96... that year I know they made the RMK and the SKS. Not so long ago, a deranged, ranting person's audience was limited to how many people happened to be on the same street. The Internet, however, has certainly allowed "crazy" to go global... Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 13th 2006 at 12:42 PM  [ Modified September 13th 2006 at 12:45 PM ] Post #5
	ford_runner1 Starting Member 8 Posts Group: Members Member Since: September 7th 2006 Location: Elbow Lake, MN, USA
	Run the model number. Its an RMK but finding any info on it is impossible. I'm thinking someone must have known somone who knew someone and got a dealer demo model a year early. Also i checkd the build date its oct 1994 Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 15th 2006 at 5:55 PM Post #6
	HighSierra Average Member 957 Posts Group: Members Member Since: January 20th 2003 Location: USA
	They didn't make an XLT RMK in 95....only an SKS....but either wat it's probably got the 133.5" track. Here's a great site to get the basic specs of Polaris sleds all the way back to 1968... Look under the specifications link http://www.polarisman.com/ Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 15th 2006 at 7:33 PM Post #7
	ford_runner1 Starting Member 8 Posts Group: Members Member Since: September 7th 2006 Location: Elbow Lake, MN, USA
	run the model number highsierra the tag on the sled dont lie. not to mention the Big RMK sticker on the back Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 15th 2006 at 9:45 PM Post #8
	95XCR600 is hiding in your girlfriend's closet! 3409 Posts Group: Members Member Since: December 23rd 2002 Location: Mason City, IA, USA Current Sled: '03 Polaris XC 600 SP 2008-2009 Miles: 0
	Quote Originally posted by ford_runner1 run the model number highsierra the tag on the sled dont lie. not to mention the Big RMK sticker on the back I don't know about the numbers, but the big RMK sticker on the back don't mean a thing. I had a big sticker on the back of mine too It says "Rocky Mountain King" on there (if you can't read it) and my sled was a '92 RXL 650 chassis. I added the tunnel extension. At any rate, unless your tunnel extension looks like the one above (as far as length), I'm going to get back on topic here and say that your track is the 133.5 inch track. ^^^^ is it short and angled down like this one? If yes, then you definitely have a 133.5 inch track. Plus, in your original post you said... Quote And why does it seem like this sled isnt supposed to exsist. ... which is probably why none of us can give you solid information about your sled. It could very well be that you have a rare machine that only a few were produced. Or, it could be that you have a 'one off' that someone made... much like my sled was... an RXL RMK XCR all combined into one. Oh, also a little bit of '05 RMK in there too Not so long ago, a deranged, ranting person's audience was limited to how many people happened to be on the same street. The Internet, however, has certainly allowed "crazy" to go global... Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 15th 2006 at 10:08 PM Post #9
	Bahlduzzi Advanced Member 1651 Posts Group: Members Member Since: November 29th 2004 Location: Sparta, WI, USA
	where did you buy the sled? I would try to did up as much info as possible. Like staded before it very well could be a custom built or mod sled sled? "It is what is is"-Brett Favre. Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 16th 2006 at 12:15 AM Post #10
	powersledder PSI Powered 3606 Posts Group: Members Member Since: September 1st 2006 Location: Houghton, MI, USA Current Sled: 07 IQr 2008-2009 Miles: No Speedo
	Have you checked www.polarisman.com to try and figure out how it came stock? Polaris 800HO monoblock cylinder for sale PM me with offers Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 16th 2006 at 12:52 AM Post #11
	JustPinIt Junior Member 144 Posts Group: Members Member Since: August 25th 2005 Location: Kelowna, BC, Canada Current Sled: 07 Polaris IQr 2008-2009 Miles: 10 grass
	133.5"....nuff said. Get a 141"...be happy!! Find The Limits and Start from There!!! Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 16th 2006 at 9:43 PM  [ Modified September 17th 2006 at 9:16 AM ] Post #12
	Squirrel2 Starting Member 18 Posts Group: Members Member Since: September 15th 2006 Location: Gillette, Wyoming, USA
	You need to post a pic of the sled because by the build date of 94 you would have a standard run-of-the mill XLT SKS. The RMK designation did not start until 97 on the 700 RMK's, XLT 600 RMK's and 500 RMK's. Later year tunnel extensions, suspensions, seat/tank combo's will bolt right on to a 95 and pretty much all of the earlier Indy models for that matter. There were no one off or early dealer release XLT SKS models in 94 or 95. If you bought a rolling chassis, it could be a hodge'podge of parts from different years. Edit: forgot about the 96 XLT RMK's and Ultra RMK's, so RMK designation came out in 96 05 King Cat 02 800 RMK 00 600 RMK 03 570 1M 89 500 SKS Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 17th 2006 at 11:33 AM Post #13
	super_pat_89 Senior Member 2488 Posts Group: Members Member Since: October 6th 2004 Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
	Quote Originally posted by powersledder Have you checked www.polarisman.com to try and figure out how it came stock? 133.5 inch track was very common on most of the Polaris' around that Era. My very first signature! "Bite off more than you can chew, then chew it!" Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 20th 2006 at 10:47 AM Post #14
	maniac_psycho_666 Junior Member 131 Posts Group: Members Member Since: August 1st 2005 Location: Fairview, Alberta, Canada
	most likely a 133.5 track by the sounds of it. Nitrous is like a hot girl with a STD, you wanna hit it but your afraid of the consequences! Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 22nd 2006 at 1:30 PM Post #15
	xltsks95 MacDaddy 21 Posts Group: Members Member Since: December 13th 2005 Location: McFarland, WI, USA Current Sled: 1998 Polaris 700 RMK
	i have a xlt sks and the track size is comparable to the rmk which is 133.5 My sleds: 2005 600 switchback 2000 600 xc 1995 600 xlt sks 1992 500 Indy Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	September 22nd 2006 at 4:39 PM Post #16
	Gnarly_Boots Average Member 814 Posts Group: Members Member Since: December 16th 2002 Location: Canada
	The 1995 XLT SKS came in two versions. Both had a 133.5 track. However, one had a 1" lug track and the other had a 1.5" lug. The 1.5" lug version was called XLTsks(paddle). I've had both, thats how I know. - Mod Climber - Three Stacks of High Society Got Snow?... Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	October 4th 2006 at 10:49 AM Post #17
	ski-poo Starting Member 6 Posts Group: Members Member Since: October 4th 2005
	you should post a pic of the sled so we all can understand what you mean by this sled that is missing pieces and get a brand new sled Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	October 18th 2006 at 11:35 PM Post #18
	polarisracing11 Boondock Saint 298 Posts Group: Members Member Since: June 6th 2006 Location: Brocket, ND, USA
	its a 136 WHEN IN DOUBT PIN IT 2009 Ski-doo 800R Summit Everest 146 HPS Can 2009 Ski-doo 860R Summit X 163 MOD 860 Bore kit, Jaws twin pipes, customized carb, clutch, and intake 2008 Ski-doo 600HO Renegade 2008 Ski-doo 800R Summit Everest 154 inch track Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	October 19th 2006 at 8:24 PM Post #19
	xtralettucetomatoe580 Tan Berets lead the way 2419 Posts Group: Members Member Since: October 4th 2005 Location: Hunter Army Airfield, GA, USA Current Sled: C17, C130, UH, CH, Lil's 2008-2009 Miles: 950
	Quote Originally posted by polarisracing11 its a 136 Umm no... 133.5 With a big wheel kit it could be a 136. Recognizing that I volunteered as a Ranger, fully knowing the hazards of my chosen profession, I will always endeavor to uphold the prestige, honor, and high esprit de corps of the Rangers. Acknowledging the fact that a Ranger is a more elite soldier who arrives at the cutting edge of battle by land, sea, or air, I accept the fact that as a Ranger my country expects me to move further, faster and fight harder than any other soldier. Never shall I fail my comrades. I will always keep myself mentally alert, physically strong and morally straight and I will shoulder more than my share of the task whatever it may be, one-hundred-percent and then some. Gallantly will I show the world that I am a specially selected and well-trained soldier. My courtesy to superior officers, neatness of dress and care of equipment shall set the example for others to follow. Energetically will I meet the enemies of my country. I shall defeat them on the field of battle for I am better trained and will fight with all my might. Surrender is not a Ranger word. I will never leave a fallen comrade to fall into the hands of the enemy and under no circumstances will I ever embarrass my country. Readily will I display the intestinal fortitude required to fight on to the Ranger objective and complete the mission though I be the lone survivor. Rangers Lead The Way!.."All the way!" <<<<<1st Bat, 75th>>>>> Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit

	October 20th 2006 at 12:36 PM Post #20
	maniac_psycho_666 Junior Member 131 Posts Group: Members Member Since: August 1st 2005 Location: Fairview, Alberta, Canada
	133.5 fo sho. unless like xtralettuce..... said u have big wheel kit on the rear... Nitrous is like a hot girl with a STD, you wanna hit it but your afraid of the consequences! Rating: 0 Quick Edit Full Edit