|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
SLP Powder Pro Skis
started by H8NOSNO
|
|
|
|
November 21st 2006 at 1:24 PM
|
|
| |
H8NOSNO
Starting Member
|
36 Posts
Group: Members
Member Since: December 8th 2003
Location: bismarck, ND, USA
|
|
|
|
| |
I just picked up a set of SLP Powder Pro Skis and was wondering if any else runs them. My main question is which mounting holes does anyone recommend setting them to. Basically they are the mounting holes to mount the ski slightly ahead or slightly back. Anyone have experiance with either setting? (pros / cons)
Thanks
North Dakota
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Site Supporter
Group: Site Supporters
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 21st 2006 at 1:40 PM
|
|
| |
|
powdermadd440
guzzlin' gas and haulin ass
powdermadd440 wonders how long it will be before snowmobiles need to be inspected in Maine.
Updated Tuesday at 6:33 PM
|
2695 Posts 
Group: Members
Member Since: October 15th 2005
Location: Fairfield, ME, USA
Current Sled: 2001 edge x 600
2008-2009 Miles: 779
|
|
|
|
| |
just my opinion but i would set them to the hole that is a little forward, because otherwise the front of the skis will tilt downward in the air.
2001 edge x 600, Vforce 3 reeds, SLP boost bottle, SLP can, yellow primary spring, 4" RSI risers, RSI backcountry bars, RSI gel wraps, Acerbis hand guards, yellow skidplate, Simmons skis, 1 3/8" camoplast track, RSI ice scratchers
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 21st 2006 at 1:58 PM
|
|
| |
|
gedertr
Junior Member
|
316 Posts 
Group: Members
Member Since: December 3rd 2004
Location: Muskegon, MI, USA
Current Sled: 2006 Fusion 600HO
2008-2009 Miles: 842
|
|
|
|
| |
The SLP mounts have three holes. To be safe, start in the middle. You can then adjust either way if you like. I left my SLP SLT skis in the middle holes because this seemed to work well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 21st 2006 at 6:25 PM
[ Modified November 30th 2006 at 12:16 PM
]
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
We run ours in the back holes!!!! Its a great Ski you will be really happy with it, I would say that it is probably the best out there!!
DW
Who loves Cougars.......We Love COUGARS!!!!
The older I get the longer my sled gets!!!!
DW
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 22nd 2006 at 5:07 PM
|
|
| |
H8NOSNO
Starting Member
|
36 Posts
Group: Members
Member Since: December 8th 2003
Location: bismarck, ND, USA
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks for the input.
As far as the skis tilting downward, that would not be an issue the way the mounts are set up.
As far as the number of mounting holes, there are only two on the set I have. Are we sure we're talking about the "Powder Pro" and not one of the other skis by SLP?
Does anyone have first hand experiance with handling characteristics between the different settings?
North Dakota
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 22nd 2006 at 9:33 PM
|
|
| |
|
WY_rider
WY_rider just snochecked a 2010 M8 sno pro 153
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I have the 2 hole pp setup on my 900. I put them in the rear holes last year. and the last 2 rides I decided to put them in the front holes. didnt seem to change anything so I left them in the rear.
2010 Arctic cat snopro 153
2005 M7 153. -Wifes sled
2002 Polaris built 800 turbo. Not a thing is stock.
2003 RMK 800 edge
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 25th 2006 at 8:48 PM
|
|
| |
HighSierra
Average Member
|
957 Posts 
Group: Members
Member Since: January 20th 2003
Location: USA
|
|
|
|
| |
Be careful of their agressivness, ESPECIALLY IN CRUSTY SNOW!!!
|
|
|
|
|
0 user(s) are reading this topic (0 Members and
0 Guests)
|
 |
|
