[NY98xltsp]

Found a nice looking one for 375$ needs carbs cleaned and a new exhaust. can anyone tell me anything about the 95 mach 1's?

 

[AKnarrowback]

If I'm remembering right they were a 670 with twin pipes from the factory. F2000 chassis with an Sc-10 rear end. They needed to run premium fuel. I only set up one when I worked for the dealership. Not much for a mountain sled. Too bulky to be a good bump sled. But the kick from the motor made it a blast to run on the river and trails. Not a mild sled by any means. The mix of the DSA front in the f2000 style and SC-10 from the s2000 seemed to work quite well.

 

[Sledman74]

A real Brut to pull over if my memory serves me correctly

 

[BskidooC]

My first sled was a 95 mach 1. Great engine, tons of power and long life span. Mine had over 9000 miles on it before she quit. The stock rear skid isnt great by any means, I would look into something a little more modern. I had dual stinger cans on it, never heard a sled that sounded like it, very low tone at idle but a good scream on the top.

 

[snowmobileguy]

I had a 95 mach 1 670 great sled wasn't lacking on power on that sled. The only thing I hated about it was it was a bare to start. Other then that I loved it sled had 5000 miles and ran great.

 

[NY98xltsp]

Thanks guys for the info. that should help me out alot

 

[snowmobileguy]

I would buy the sled for that price. What kinda shape is the sled in and how many miles?

 

[wakeboarderboy]

That is a great price. I had a friend who got rid of hit and if I remember right the thing was fast as hell for its time.

 

[NY98xltsp]

Its in pretty good shape. needs a new windshield and exhaust but other than that its good. The only thing is the guy has no paperwork for it and i just feel uncomfortable buying a sled without proper paperwork

 

[skidoostud95]

It sounds like a nice sled... I would probably feel a little uncomfortable buying without paper work, but 375 sounds like a steal, I would take that in a heartbeat. Those mach ones had the 670 rotax which i think is one of the greatest engines skidoo has ever made.

 

[BskidooC]

Im not suprised he doesnt have paperwork for it, its an old sled, who knows who has the m.s.o. and stuff for it. You would probly be alright buying it.

 

[pro-x220x]

yea 375 sounds like a great price even w/o paperwork so i would take it, a 670 sounds like a powerhouse of an engine and from what everyone else is saying it sounds like that they are pretty reliable too. if its in good running condition then i would take it for the price. quick question were the 670's triples or twins?

 

[NY98xltsp]

twins.

 

[pro-x220x]

oh because i know they started making the 670's into triples in the 97 model year

 

[AKnarrowback]

D'oh!

Ignore what I said before. The sled I was thinking about was a "prototype" our manager wanted to build. He made his own Mach out of a summit 670 and a 94 mx. The stickers were custom made to match the mach that was to be released the next season. He actually sold the thing to a customer, who promptly trashed it because he had no respect for the value of a sled.

What can I say, my mind is going........