the xc700 is a better trail sled, and is faster than the zrt. it handles soo much better there is no comparison between these two sleds.
How about 125 hp and the long legs of a triple.. What are the weights of the two sleds? Do you know?Originally posted by Achotrod
[br]XC 4 sure!!!! And i like cats more!!!! Whats the point of a triple 600??? when u can have a lighter twin 700!
I know you this already but he is talking a 97 zrt. The handling on the 97 will be alot differnt then the 96 due to the rear suspension. The 97 was the first year for ETT and the torque sensing link, that added like 4 inches of suspension I think.Originally posted by RMK-KING
[br]I have owned a 96 ZRT and a 97 RMK which is basically a XC with a 136 track. The XC will handle and ride alot better and is lighter. Power is similar, XC will have more bottom end punch were the ZRT might have an advantage on the top end.
I don't know what the ZRT weighs but the 98 XC700 was 485 lbsOriginally posted by Achotrod
[br]dONT HAVE THE SPECS ON ME BUT IT THINK THE ZRT IS AROUND 525POUNDS AND THE XC AROUND 510LB.
Originally posted by arcticcatmatt
[br]^ your always going to get a polaris biased opinion on SF in my opinion no matter where you post the question. This forum is mainly polaris members as it's linked with polarisfiles and stuff.
Both of them sleds are different machines. Depends what you want to do with it and what areas you want it to accel in. I personally would rule the XC out because it has had its motor rebuilt. Who knows if it was done right or not.