Joined
·
151 Posts
what is the horse power on my 2002 xc 800 sp with ves, everything is stock
Comments like this aren't helpful.Originally posted by Racing666
[br]less than 50 hp... lol
Yea I agreeOriginally posted by Triple650Indy
[br]Comments like this aren't helpful.Originally posted by Racing666
[br]less than 50 hp... lol
He's got 28 posts, usually people with 28 posts want the jist not the ****.Originally posted by Racing666
[br]it was a joke...lighten up everyone jeez..
It would have been much more hilarious if you had said, "At least 50."Originally posted by Racing666
[br]it was a joke...lighten up everyone jeez..
but the question was about an 800.Originally posted by xcr440
[br]I had mine dynoed at 127 hp and with air box gutted it was 133 hp.
Only mod is a recut head with 12.85 comp.
the clutching and gearing is also different between the two. i don't believe that the VES 800 makes the same HP as a non VES 800, and also the same as a 700. not arguing with you really, i would just have to see a real comparison to believe that. mechanically it makes no sense at all. i believe 135+ for a 2002 800 VES motor.Originally posted by xcr440
[br]I know, they were supposed to be not many were. A stock 700 would run neck and neck with a 800.
Take a mid 90s sled, say a 600, and race against a 600 of today. New technology is constantly coming out. It seems some new technology came out on the 2003 XC 700 that gives it more hp than previous year 700.Originally posted by Customized89Trail
[br]the clutching and gearing is also different between the two. i don't believe that the VES 800 makes the same HP as a non VES 800, and also the same as a 700. not arguing with you really, i would just have to see a real comparison to believe that. mechanically it makes no sense at all. i believe 135+ for a 2002 800 VES motor.Originally posted by xcr440
[br]I know, they were supposed to be not many were. A stock 700 would run neck and neck with a 800.
i was kind of saying something like that. i was saying that the 2001 800 had between 127-130 from the factory and the later VES 800s have more. but i was also saying more than that. i'm saying that i believe the 700s made less power than 800s but the gearing difference in them may have made up for the HP difference, making the 700 with a little less power able to accelerate right with an 800.Originally posted by FUSION900PA
[br]Take a mid 90s sled, say a 600, and race against a 600 of today. New technology is constantly coming out. It seems some new technology came out on the 2003 XC 700 that gives it more hp than previous year 700.Originally posted by Customized89Trail
[br]the clutching and gearing is also different between the two. i don't believe that the VES 800 makes the same HP as a non VES 800, and also the same as a 700. not arguing with you really, i would just have to see a real comparison to believe that. mechanically it makes no sense at all. i believe 135+ for a 2002 800 VES motor.Originally posted by xcr440
[br]I know, they were supposed to be not many were. A stock 700 would run neck and neck with a 800.